Women have the right to know there are two breast cancer risks associated with abortion. All experts recognize first risk- that abortion denies women an opportunity to reduce their risk for breast cancer through childbearing. Scientists only debate the second risk - known as the "independent link."        Eight medical organizations and a bioethics journal recognize the independent link - that abortion leaves a woman with more cancer-vulnerable cells than she had before she became pregnant. An additional medical group, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, has called for "full disclosure" of a "highly plausible" relationship between abortion and the disease.        Overwhelming evidence of a cause-effect relationship is supported by... 1. A biological explanation which scientists have been unable to disprove and do not challenge. 2. A study on rats. 3. Epidemiological research.        Scientists began extensive research on the abortion-breast cancer link in 1957. Why didn’t the government and cancer fundraising businesses want women to know about the existence of this research? If they cared about women’s health, they would have revealed their research to the public.        According to the "Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer (1973-1998)," published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute in 2001, only the youngest of three generations - the Roe v. Wade generation - suffered a more than 40% increase in breast cancer cases since the mid-1980s. These were women young enough to have had access to legal abortions starting in 1973. The increase in breast cancer rates didn’t take place among women from the two older generations that couldn’t obtain legal abortions.        The U.S. National Cancer Institute, the American Cancer Society, and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention collaborated on the report. Two of the report’s authors had conducted earlier research showing that abortion increases breast cancer risk, but that research and the word "abortion" were omitted from the report. The report’s authors expressed no interest whatsoever in preventing breast cancer. [Howe et al. Jrnl Natl Cancer Inst (June 6, 2001) Vol. 93, No. 11, Figure 3]        Two American women have succeeded in prosecuting their medical malpractice lawsuits against abortion doctors, who failed to warn them about the risks of breast cancer and emotional damage. Neither of the women has yet developed breast cancer.        Post-abortive women are being deprived of a window of opportunity to adopt strategies to reduce their risk for breast cancer, seek early detection, and join clinical trials. They’re denying abortion-bound adolescents and young women their rights to make informed choices about their health care.

Stop the Cover-up!

BE INFORMED, SPREAD THE WORD

Coalition on

Abortion/Breast

Cancer

P.O. Box 957133

Hoffman Estates, IL 60195-3051 USA

 

Toll Free: 877.803.0102

Local Calls: 847.421.4000

 

Click here to

send e-mail

How to Reduce
Rates of Breast Cancer, Premature Birth

 

U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops on Abortion-Breast

Cancer Link

 

Med. Jrnl.: Review shows recent prospective studies are seriously flawed. Article.

Press Release.

 

Bioethics Journal: U.S. National Cancer Institute Covers Up Abortion-Cancer Link

 

Bioethics journal blasts journal Lancet, scientific community

“The corruption of science by ideology”

By Ed Furton, MA, Ph.D.

Ethics and Medics

 

Bioethics journal lists serious flaws in Lancet “review” article “The abortion-breast cancer link re-visited,” By Angela Lanfranchi Ethics and Medics

 

FACT SHEET… Abortion and  Breast Cancer: Re: “collaborative reanalysis of data” published in Lancet

 

Womens Group Accuses Lancet, Oxford

Scientists of Misrepresenting Abortion-Breast Cancer Research / Scientists Excluded Studies Reporting Large Risk Elevations

 

Abortion and Breast Cancer: Only fuzzy math can make the ABC link disappear By Joel Brind, Ph.D.

 

‘Rival’ Cancer Experts Clash in Medical Journal

 

National Cancer Institute And Scientific Misconduct

 

Abortion/Breast Cancer Risk Graphs

 

How governmental

agencies and cancer fundraising businesses easily deceived journalists about the abortion-breast cancer link

 

Legally Induced

Abortion: the best

predictor of 3 British breast cancer trends

 

The Breast Physiology and the Epidemiology of the Abortion Breast Cancer Link

 

Link to the National

Cancer Institute on

Abortion Article on

Conservapedia

Important Links

Click here to join our Mailing List

[Click here]

Bioethics Journal Accuses Lancet, Scientific Community of Corrupting Science

(In November 2004, the bioethics journal, Ethics and Medics, published a critique by Associate Professor of Surgery Angela Lanfranchi, MD, FACS. Lanfranchi severely criticized a widely reported review of the abortion-breast cancer research published in the British journal Lancet in March 2004. The Lancet article was authored by by Oxford scientists Valerie Beral and her colleagues. Lanfranchi's critique was published on the coalition's home page on November 20, 2004.)

 

The bioethics journal, Ethics and Medics, published a hard-hitting editorial in its December 2004 issue accusing the British journal Lancet and the scientific community of corrupting scientific research examining the abortion-breast cancer link. The editorial, "The corruption of science by ideology," was authored by Edward J. Furton, M.A., Ph.D.

Here are selected quotes from the editorial: (Click here for the entire editorial--PDF)

QUICK NAVIGATION

FAQ

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

 

Does your cancer fundraising group tell women that the female breast does not fully mature from cancer vulnerable lobules into cancer resistant lobules until a woman has a full term pregnancy?

 

Click here for some basic information that the cancer fundraising industry and the abortion industry don’t want you to have.

Quick Jump:

Important News:

Newsletter - March 20, 2008

What the Arkansas Times doesn't want women to know

 

Press Release - March 14, 2008

Oncologists at University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences are Either Liars or Uniformed, Says Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer

 

Press Release - March 3, 2008

Medical Journal: Federal Agencies, Academicians Suppress Evidence of Breast Cancer Risk Factors

 

Newsletter - January 30, 2008

Moody Broadcasting Network & Los Angeles Times Bias

 

Newsletter - January 29, 2008

Charnette Messe Prayer Request

 

Newsletter - December 31, 2007

"British women's right to choose is under covert attack" and "My research is not 'junk science"

 

Newsletter - December 28, 2007

"Abortion and Breast Cancer" and "Matching Trend to Trend"

 

Press Release - December 11, 2007

Medical Journal Shows How to Reduce Rates of Breast Cancer, Premature Birth

 

Newsletter - December 6, 2007

Study: Abortion Fueling Cancer Epidemic

 

Newsletter - December 5, 2007

Study: Abortion Fueling Cancer Epidemic

 

Newsletter - December 4, 2007

Why isn't this study on the pill heeded?

 

Newsletter - November 20, 2007

Abortion’s Deadly Link to Breast Cancer and the Huge Costs Thereof

 

Newsletter - November 11, 2007

The Komen paradox

 

Press Release - November 7, 2007

The Actuary: Breast Cancer Epidemic's Impact From Abortion on Insurance, Health Care through 2029 Is Serious

 

Newsletter - November 1, 2007

The American Cancer Society is digging its own grave

 

Newsletter - October 29, 2007

Fully Aware Breast Cancer Organizations Promote Only ‘Selective Awareness’

 

Press Release - October 26, 2007

Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer Challenges Science Blogs Bloggers to Act Like Genuine Experts

 

Newsletter - October 22, 2007

Snubbing cancer study will only hurt women Research showing link to abortion ignored by media

 

Press Release - October 10, 2007

Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer Challenges LiveScience.com Columnist to Publicly Debate Abortion-Cancer Link

 

Newsletter - October 10, 2007

"CHRISTMAS IN OCTOBER: Breast Cancer Awareness Month"

 

Press Release - October 4, 2007

Childbearing Protects Women from Breast Cancer Only When Mothers Deliver at 32 Weeks Gestation or Later

 

Press Release - October 3, 2007

New Study Shows 'Best Predictor of Breast Cancer'

 

Newsletter - August 30, 2007

A New Project

 

Newsletter - August 8, 2007

Abortion and Breast Cancer: The Link that Won't Go Away

 

Newsletter - July 23, 2007

Open Letters to the Editor of the Chicago Tribune

 

Newsletter - July 18, 2007

Is breast cancer linked to induced abortions?"

 

Newsletter - June 8, 2007

Komen raises money far from its race's beaten path, Planned Parenthood gets a helping

 

Press Release - June 4, 2007

Medical Journal: Flawed Study Underestimated Breast Cancer Risk of Abortion

Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer Urges Journalists to Hold Researchers' Feet to the Fire

 

Newsletter - May 21, 2007

"The Worst Part"

 

Press Release - April 23, 2007

New Abortion-Cancer Study Severely Flawed, Says Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer / Group Calls on Journalists to Challenge Researchers to Do a Proper Study

 

Press Release - April 18, 2007

Coalition Warns Texas Legislators: Taxpayers, Insurance Consumers Pay for Abortion Risks - Breast Cancer, Premature Birth / Coalition Asks, "Why Fund Planned Parenthood?"

 

Press Release - April 12, 2007

Coalition Berates American Cancer Society for Withholding Cancer Evidence

 

Newsletter - March 28, 2007

Chicago Tribune Joins Chorus of News Outlets Harassing Crisis Pregnancy Centers

 

Newsletter - March 20, 2007

TIME Magazine Cover Story on Abortion Tells Only Part of the Story

 

Newsletter - March 13, 2007

Canadian Women Speak out at the United Nations about Pain of Legal Abortion

 

Newsletter - March 13, 2007

Testimony of Karen Malec

 

Press Release - February 20, 2006

Breast Cancer Rates Reach Nearly 275,000 Cases / Deaths Increase / Cancer Fundraising Businesses Not Interested in Prevention, Still Lying About Abortion-Cancer Link

 

Newsletter - February 2, 2006

"The U.S. Government's 'Big Lie' / What scientists know about breast cancer and when they knew it"

 

Newsletter - December 5, 2005

"Studies denying abortion-cancer link debunked / Professor's review of latest research upholds causal relationship"

 

Newsletter - February 2, 2005

Judgment Awarded in Abortion-Breast Cancer Case: First of its Kind against Clinic for Failing to Inform Patient against Increased Risk

 

Press Release - January 26, 2005

Second Abortion-Cancer Lawsuit in U.S. Successfully Prosecuted

 

Press Release - October 22, 2003

First U.S. Abortion-Breast Cancer Lawsuit Settled